Re: [PATCH] Patch to compute Max LSN of Data Pages

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch to compute Max LSN of Data Pages
Date: 2012-11-11 14:51:59
Message-ID: 20121111145159.GB5720@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 02:18:11AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit kapila wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:19 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > > This patch is now marked Returned with Feedback in the CF, but I see no
> > > on-list feedback. Did some review happen?
> >
> > No review happened for this patch.
> > It has returned due to slight confusion thinking that this is same as:
> > Patch for option in pg_resetxlog for restore from WAL files (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=897 ) for which Heikki has given some comments.
>
> Oops, sorry, my mistake. Please reopen it as needing review.

Done.

> I will
> move all the open patches to CF3, unless someone beats me to it. I
> probably won't be able to get anything done tomorrow, so if somebody has
> a boring Sunday I would appreciate the help.

Likewise.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lars Kanis 2012-11-11 14:55:11 Re: Failing SSL connection due to weird interaction with openssl
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-11-11 07:43:44 Re: Inadequate thought about buffer locking during hot standby replay