Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Heikki Linnakangas' <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "noah(at)leadboat(dot)com" <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date: 2012-10-23 18:45:09
Message-ID: 20121023184509.GB8724@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit kapila wrote:

> Rebased version of patch based on latest code.

Uhm, how can this patch change a caller of PageAddItem() by adding one
more argument, yet not touch bufpage.c at all? Are you sure this
compiles?

The email subject has a WIP tag; is that still the patch status? If so,
I assume it's okay to mark this Returned with Feedback and expect a
later version to be posted.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ants Aasma 2012-10-23 20:06:07 Re: ToDo: KNN Search should to support DISTINCT clasuse?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-10-23 17:56:26 Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys