Re: FDW for PostgreSQL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Shigeru HANADA <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FDW for PostgreSQL
Date: 2012-10-23 15:35:23
Message-ID: 20121023153523.GG4971@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Shigeru HANADA escribió:

> Please examine attached v2 patch (note that is should be applied onto
> latest dblink_fdw_validator patch).

Tom committed parts of the dblink_fdw_validator patch, but not the
removal, so it seems this patch needs to be rebased on top of that
somehow. I am not able to say what's the best resolution for that
conflict, however. But it seems to me that maybe you will need to
choose a different name for the validator after all, to support binary
upgrades.

There are some other comments downthread that a followup patch probably
needs to address too, as well. I am marking this patch Returned with
Feedback. Please submit an updated version to CF3.

Thanks.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-10-23 16:02:13 Re: too much pgbench init output
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-10-23 15:25:40 Re: Re: proposal and patch : support INSERT INTO...RETURNING with partitioned table using rule