Re: Deprecations in authentication

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deprecations in authentication
Date: 2012-10-22 14:24:41
Message-ID: 20121022142441.GJ29165@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus, all,

* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > That seems like a sufficiently long deprecation window, but is gssapi
> > a full substitute for krb5? I don't really have a strong opinion on
> > this, not being a user myself.
>
> I'm pretty sure that it is.
>
> Stephen, you usually have comments about the Kerberos stuff - want to
> comment on this one? :)

The biggest risk that I can think of regarding deprecating krb5 would be
platforms (if any still exist...) which don't have GSSAPI. Is it
possible to see that from the buildfarm information or from the
configure results that people have for any strange/different platforms
out there? The other question would be if we think anyone's actually
using krb5 on those platforms and/or would people in those situations be
willing/able to move to a different library which supports GSSAPI.

I'm all for deprecating krb5 myself, but I wouldn't want to break things
for people without good cause.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-10-22 14:57:33 Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-10-22 14:18:08 Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM