| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Out-of-policy Planet post? |
| Date: | 2012-10-08 19:03:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20121008190340.GB28746@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> WWW,
> >>
> >> "8 New Oracle compatibility features in EnterpriseDB PPAS 9.2 Beta"
> >>
> >> Last I checked, the end result of discussion on this list was that no
> >> blogging about proprietary forks of PostgreSQL was permitted on Planet.
> >> It's a policy I disagreed with, but if that's our policy, we should
> >> follow it.
> >>
> >> Since Ras seems to be a new blogger, someone from WWW should just inform
> >> him of the policy and remove the post.
> >
> > Yes, I assumed someone had already done that, so I didn't say anything,
> > but I agree.
>
> Does it actually violate the policy though? It's pretty darn vague...
> I agree it's very much a borderline so somebody should probably send
> him a warning about it, but I'm not sure it's actually a strict
> violation?
Would the post be interesting to anyone not using the EDB commercial
product? I didn't think it would be.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-10-08 21:29:54 | Re: Out-of-policy Planet post? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-10-08 18:57:02 | Re: Out-of-policy Planet post? |