Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Patric Bechtel <patric(dot)bechtel(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC
Date: 2012-08-30 20:53:02
Message-ID: 20120830205302.GY8753@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:51:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:10:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> However, as pointed out by Patric, if you dump and restore an old
> >> timestamptz value in one of these zones, it will fail to restore because
> >> of the sanity check. I think therefore that we'd better enlarge the
> >> allowed range to 15:59:59 either way.
>
> > Any status on this?
>
> Shipped in last week's updates.

Thank you.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-30 20:53:39 Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-30 20:52:41 Re: --disable-shared is entirely broken these days