Re: psql output locations

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql output locations
Date: 2012-08-26 02:59:00
Message-ID: 20120826025900.GI10814@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:28:58PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:22:38PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie ago 17 11:17:58 -0400 2012:
> > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:57:25AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> > > > >>> * There are a number of things that are always written to stdout, that
> > > > >>> there is no way to redirect. In some cases it's interactive prompts -
> > > > >>> makes sense - but also for example the output of \timing goes to
> > > > >>> stdout always. Is there some specific logic behind what/when this
> > > > >>> should be done?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Everything that is not an error goes to stdout, no?  Except the query
> > > > >> output, if you change it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Maybe the way to do what you want is to invent a new setting that
> > > > >> temporarily changes stdout.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, that might be it. Or I need separate settings for "put errors in
> > > > > the query output stream" and "put non-query-output-but-also-non-errors
> > > > > in the query output stream". The effect would be the same, I guess...
> > > >
> > > > That seems an awful lot harder (and messier) than just changing the
> > > > all the call sites to use the same error-reporting function.
> > >
> > > I have done as you suggested with the attached patch.
> >
> > The very first hunk in your patch changes code that seems to be
> > explicitely checking the "interactive" flag. Is the change really
> > wanted there? Note Magnus explicitely commented about those in his
> > original post.
>
> I noticed that but the output would be the same because there is no
> input file location to trigger. I thought the interactive flag was
> there just to provide more customized text.

Applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-26 03:02:07 Re: Replication timeout units
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-26 02:48:59 Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources