| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Rick Otten <rotten(at)manta(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: average query performance measuring |
| Date: | 2012-08-21 20:27:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20120821202702.GO1267@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Karl,
* Karl Denninger (karl(at)denninger(dot)net) wrote:
> That looks EXTREMELY useful and I'm looking forward to checking it out
> in 9.2; I have asked a similar question about profiling actual queries
> in the past and basically it came down to "turn on explain or run a
> separate explain yourself since the app knows what's similar and what's
> not", which of course has hideous performance implications (as the query
> basically executes twice.)
Just to clarify one thing- if your application is currently using
prepared queries for everything, you can probably use the existing
contrib module. The difference is that, with 9.2, it'll actually do
normalization of non-PREPARED queries and will include some additional
statistics and information.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig James | 2012-08-21 20:59:06 | Re: Does setval(nextval()+N) generate unique blocks of IDs? |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2012-08-21 20:04:59 | Re: Does setval(nextval()+N) generate unique blocks of IDs? |