Re: [BUGS] BUG #6184: Inconsistencies in log messages

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ding Yuan <ding(dot)yuan(dot)90(at)hotmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6184: Inconsistencies in log messages
Date: 2012-08-15 23:11:42
Message-ID: 20120815231142.GU25473@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 06:42:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > [ moved to hackers]
>
> > Would someone review this report for me? I think there are few
> > reasonable changes in here, but I am not familiar enough with all the
> > code areas.
>
> >> ======================== Report 7
> >> ==========================================
> >> The log message at line 3050 and line 3142 have inconsistent verbosity
> >> levels!
>
> The inconsistency here is a consequence of commit
> 82748bc253e00a07f0fcce3959af711b509a4e69, so it's entirely intentional,
> and presumably a result of discussion in the mailing lists (I'm too lazy
> to go look for the thread right now).
>
> I notice that that commit failed to adjust the adjacent comment, though
> --- tut tut, Bruce.

Oops, thanks, fixed, and thanks for reviewing this report.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-15 23:18:03 Re: Possible Bug in 9.2beta3
Previous Message daniel 2012-08-15 23:06:41 BUG #7498: Questionable interval parsing when in the form 'n m days'

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-15 23:20:58 Re: Planner avoidance of index only scans for partial indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-08-15 22:42:51 Re: [BUGS] BUG #6184: Inconsistencies in log messages