| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Qi Huang <huangqiyx(at)outlook(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Git diff patch in context diff format |
| Date: | 2012-08-08 17:29:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20120808172932.GA23599@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 05:03:04PM +0800, Qi Huang wrote:
> Hi, hackers
> I was exporting my project to a patch file. As the patch review requires,
> the patch needs to be in context diff format (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/
> Reviewing_a_Patch). But the git diff exports in a format similar to unified
> format. What is everyone doing with patching now? Is there any standard way?
Have you read our wiki about git and diffs?
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Git#Context_diffs_with_Git
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-08-08 17:31:22 | Re: avoid unnecessary failure to open restored WAL files |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-08 17:28:35 | Re: bug of pg_trgm? |