Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123
Date: 2012-08-08 17:27:58
Message-ID: 20120808172758.GA16652@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 09:26:41AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Did we ever decide on this?
>
> We discussed it to the point of consensus, and Tom wrote a patch to
> implement that. Testing in my shop hit problems for which the cause
> was not obvious. I don't know whether there is a flaw in the
> designed approach that we all missed, a simple programming bug of
> some sort in the patch, or pilot error on this end. It's on my list
> of things to do, but it's hovering around 4th place on that list,
> and new things seem to be appearing at the top of that list at about
> the rate that I can clear them. :-(
>
> > Is it a TODO?
>
> We don't want to lose track of it, but with a pending patch to
> debug, I'm not sure the TODO list is the right place to put it.

OK, I will let it linger on your TODO list then.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-08 17:28:35 Re: bug of pg_trgm?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2012-08-08 15:30:54 Re: WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries