| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: -Wformat-zero-length |
| Date: | 2012-08-03 20:02:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20120803200228.GI3463@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 04:01:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I don't disagree with pg_upgrade being operationally complex, but I
> >> don't see how this relates to contrib vs. non-contrib at all. Are we
> >> supposed to only have "simple" programs in src/bin? That seems a
> >> strange policy.
> >
> > Well, perhaps we need to re-open the discussion then.
>
> I feel like putting it in src/bin would carry an implication of
> robustness that I'm not sanguine about. Granted, putting it in
> contrib has already pushed the envelope in that direction further than
> is perhaps warranted. But ISTM that if we ever want to put this in
> src/bin someone needs to devote some serious engineering time to
> filing down the rough edges.
I don't know how to file down any of the existing rough edges.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-08-03 20:03:00 | Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-08-03 20:01:18 | Re: -Wformat-zero-length |