Re: Gartner report on Postgresql

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jim(dot)Smith(at)Bull(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Gartner report on Postgresql
Date: 2012-07-27 01:37:26
Message-ID: 20120727013726.GH24238@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:33:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:36:41PM -0700, Jim(dot)Smith(at)Bull(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > I have a potential customer that would like to see a Gartner review which
> > includes PostgreSQL. Has anyone seen something like this?
>
> No, but you might find this interesting: ;-)
>
> Why does the IT industry continue to listen to Gartner?
> http://www.zdnet.com/why-does-the-it-industry-continue-to-listen-to-gartner-7000001394/

Oh, and if you are interested in Forrester, look at this 2009 Ingres
article summary: ;-)

http://info.actian.com/g/?UJR6Q22767=clicksrc:ingres-analyst

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-07-27 02:36:38 Re: Gartner report on Postgresql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-07-27 01:33:59 Re: Gartner report on Postgresql