Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
Date: 2012-07-10 16:59:18
Message-ID: 20120710165918.GD8689@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Testing maybe? I feel we have just avoided saying what you can and
> > can't do with the standbys and pg_upgrade, so I think we have to state
> > something. If we just want to say "recreate", let's say that.
>
> Well, the bottom line is we can'd do *anything* with a standby with pg_upgrade.
>
> Once you've promoted it, it is no longer a standby, and now you can
> use pg_upgrade.
>
> >> And I think the sentence about running rsync is extremely vague - run
> >> rsync where and how? What are you actually trying to suggest people
> >> do?
> >
> > Updated docs attached.
>
> I suggest just removing the rsync part completely. You're basically
> saying "you ca nset up a new standby after you're done", which is kind
> of obvious anyway. And if you're going to use rsync fromthe master to
> make a new standby, there's no point in running pg_upgrade on the new
> standby in the first place.

I went the other direction and just said you can't upgrade a standby (as
a standby), and to just use rsync --- patch attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_upgrade.diff text/x-diff 756 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-07-10 16:59:50 Re: pg_prewarm
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2012-07-10 16:57:24 Re: Synchronous Standalone Master Redoux