| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Evan D(dot) Hoffman" <evandhoffman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgresql Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade: "pg_ctl failed to start the new server" |
| Date: | 2012-06-16 00:01:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20120616000151.GA32082@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 08:03:49AM -0400, Evan D. Hoffman wrote:
> So it appears the problem was inability to connect, although
> pg_upgrade reported that it couldn't start the server (I assume
> ability to connect is how it determines whether or not the server was
> started).
Ah, OK, so it was the connection that failed. I wasn't aware pg_ctl
start could fail in that case (we added PGping), but obviously it can.
The attached patch applied to PG 9.2 and current will give a more
appropriate error message saying it might be a connection problem.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_upgrade.diff | text/x-diff | 724 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2012-06-16 06:13:46 | Re: Smaller multiple tables or one large table? |
| Previous Message | Mark Phillips | 2012-06-15 20:20:52 | Re: full text index / search |