Re: BUG #6666: pg_upgrade 9.2beta1 plpython/plpython2

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6666: pg_upgrade 9.2beta1 plpython/plpython2
Date: 2012-06-13 16:34:48
Message-ID: 20120613163448.GH4419@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:32:40AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Should this be back-patched?  (Problem first reported in PG 9.1 due to
> > the removal of a backward-compatibility symlink.)  I am not sure we have
> > had enough problem reports to warrant it (3 reports).
>
> We back-patch a lot of things based on a single report. Three is a lot.

OK, batckpatched to Postgres 9.1. I don't think anyone is still major
release upgrading to 9.0 or earlier.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message msrbugzilla 2012-06-13 18:03:39 BUG #6692: Potential Bug in equalfuncs.c
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-06-13 15:52:44 Re: 9.2 beta2 - pg_ctl crashes on Win32 when neither PGDATA nor -D specified