Re: WalSndWakeup() and synchronous_commit=off

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WalSndWakeup() and synchronous_commit=off
Date: 2012-05-30 12:46:19
Message-ID: 201205301446.19836.andres@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 08:42:43 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Patch attached.
Imo this patch should be backported to 9.1, 9.0 doesn't use latches and does
not do explicit wakeup of the sender so its not applicable there.

I can prepare a patch for 9.1 if people agree, there has been some amount of
change that won't make it apply cleanly.

Greetings,

Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2012-05-30 12:54:07 Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-05-30 12:34:39 Re: slow dropping of tables, DropRelFileNodeBuffers, tas