| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade libraries check |
| Date: | 2012-05-29 14:22:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20120529142246.GF20260@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 02:39:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:31:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't recall exactly what problems drove us to make pg_upgrade do
> >> what it does with extensions, but we need a different fix for them.
>
> > Uh, pg_upgrade doesn't do anything special with extensions, so it must
> > have been something people did in pg_dump.
>
> Most of the dirty work is in pg_dump --binary_upgrade, but it's pretty
> disingenuous of you to disavow responsibility for those kluges. They
> are part and parcel of pg_upgrade IMO.
True. I was just saying I did not write any of that code and have not
studied it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2012-05-29 14:25:07 | Re: [RFC] Interface of Row Level Security |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-05-29 14:13:14 | Re: [RFC] Interface of Row Level Security |