Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-05-22 21:27:47
Message-ID: 20120522212747.GC10306@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:49:25PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 16.05.2012 22:38, Jeff Janes wrote:
> >For item:
> >Improve COPY performance by adding tuples to the heap in batches
> >(Heikki Linnakangas)
> >
> >I think we should point out that the batching only applies for COPY
> >into unindexed tables. Nice as the feature is, that is pretty big
> >limitation not to mention.
>
> No, it applies to indexed tables too. However, if there are indexes
> on the table, the overhead of updating the indexes will probably
> make any speedup in the heap insertions look tiny in comparison.
>
> The optimization doesn't apply if the table has BEFORE or INSTEAD OF
> triggers, or volatile DEFAULT expressions need to be evaluated.

So, I will assume the existing wording is fine.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-05-22 21:36:38 Re: Add primary key/unique constraint using prefix columns of an index
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-22 21:26:45 Re: Draft release notes complete