* Andres Freund (andres(at)anarazel(dot)de) wrote:
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to pass a named pipe under windows and use a
> AF_UNIX socket everwhere else. Both should be pretty easily usable with the
> existing code. PG already seems to use named pipes under windows, so...
I didn't think Tom's suggestion was really all that difficult to
implement and sounds like a more-generally-useful change anyway (which
you might want to use outside of this specific use case).
Thanks,
Stephen