| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
| Date: | 2012-03-29 18:34:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20120329183448.GA14785@feivel.credativ.lan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:03:41PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Still, we're looking at dedicated ECPG syntax, quite visible even to folks
> with no interest in Informix. We have eschewed littering our syntax with
> compatibility aids, and I like it that way. IMO, an option to the "ecpg"
> preprocessor is an acceptable level of muddle to provide this aid. A DECLARE
> CURSOR syntax extension goes too far.
+1 from me.
Let's not add special ecpg sql syntax if we don't absolutely have to.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-29 18:39:04 | Re: Finer Extension dependencies |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-03-29 18:28:39 | Re: Finer Extension dependencies |