From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Planet posting policy |
Date: | 2012-01-30 04:25:38 |
Message-ID: | 20120130042538.GA24817@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:59:29AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have a strict posting policy for planet.postgresql.org
> (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Planet_PostgreSQL) which has been
> applied in such a way that it prevents users posting anything to their
> syndicated blogs which may be remotely considered to be advertising.
> This has tripped up a number of our regular contributors in the past,
> including some senior community members who have posted technical
> content about their work which happens to be on commercial products
> around PostgreSQL.
>
> I'd like to propose relaxing this policy (or perhaps the
> interpretation of it) to allow useful content to be posted that
> happens to be centered around commercial products, whilst being
> careful to avoid pure advertising content which we certainly do not
> want (and should continue to be posted as news or pgsql-announce
> articles).
While I am not against relaxing the rules, it would be a shame if the
new rules were more vague than the old ones. The old rules, while
strict, were very easy to mentally filter; I am worried more vague
rules will lead to more uncertainty and perhaps arguments/hurt feelings.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-01-30 05:21:57 | Re: Planet posting policy |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-01-29 22:26:23 | Re: My book |