Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage

From: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
Date: 2012-01-27 15:48:11
Message-ID: 20120127154811.GC4107@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:35:04AM -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> > - The meaning of PGresAttValue is changed. The field 'value' now
> >  contains a value withOUT terminating zero. This change seems to
> >  have no effect on any other portion within the whole source
> >  tree of postgresql from what I've seen.
>
> This is a minor point of concern. This function was exposed to
> support libpqtypes (which your stuff compliments very nicely by the
> way) and I quickly confirmed removal of the null terminator didn't
> cause any problems there. I doubt anyone else is inspecting the
> structure directly (also searched the archives and didn't find
> anything).
>
> This needs to be advertised very loudly in the docs -- I understand
> why this was done but it's a pretty big change in the way the api
> works.

Note that the non-NUL-terminated PGresAttValue is only used for row
handler. So no existing usage is affected.

But I agree using same struct in different situations is confusing,
thus the request for separate struct for row handler usage.

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-01-27 15:57:41 Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Previous Message MauMau 2012-01-27 15:45:19 Unreliable "pg_ctl -w start" again