| From: | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <ads(at)pgug(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Nominations, and reasons |
| Date: | 2012-01-10 16:08:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20120110160825.GC10889@fermium.wars-nicht.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgeu-general |
Well,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:03:40PM +0100, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 16:46, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > The mail I sent yesterday says clearly that you can nominate yourself.
> > But you need someone to second your nomination.
> >
> > Copy/paste:
> > For a member to be a candidate in the elections, he/she must be
> > nominated by one member and seconded by at least one other. It is
> > possible to nominate yourself.
>
> Yes, that is precisely what I was referring to. It'd be advisable that
> the first nomination comes from the nominee him/herself. Than someone
> else would eventually second it.
>
> Much easier than nominating someone who's not going to accept or having
> to privately check before sending out a nomination.
Some people/cultures prefer not to nominate her-/himself.
If someone wants to nominate her-/himself, this way is open. Imho there
is no real problem here.
Bye
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors
Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2012-01-10 16:24:51 | Re: Nominations, and reasons |
| Previous Message | Matteo Beccati | 2012-01-10 16:03:40 | Re: Nominations, and reasons |