Re: is it normal behavior of index?

From: "Jean-Yves F(dot) Barbier" <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is it normal behavior of index?
Date: 2012-01-01 17:40:59
Message-ID: 20120101184059.15bfab98@anubis.defcon1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 16:12:10 +0100
Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> wrote:

>
> I think, in this case you needs 2 indexes, one with and one without the
> opclass - option.
>
......
> Note that you should also create an index with the default operator
> class if you want queries involving ordinary <, <=, >, or >= comparisons
> to use an index. Such queries cannot use the xxx_pattern_ops operator
> classes.

Aïe I missed this one; that was my conclusion but I wanted to make
absolutely sure.
Thanks Andreas.
JY
--
Alimony is the curse of the writing classes.
-- Norman Mailer

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-01-01 18:01:58 Re: How to declare a variable in a postgresql query in sql language ?
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2012-01-01 15:12:10 Re: is it normal behavior of index?