Re: Page Checksums

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Page Checksums
Date: 2011-12-18 18:44:00
Message-ID: 20111218184400.GB14268@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:19:32PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 18.12.2011 10:54, David Fetter wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:14:38AM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>On 17.12.2011 23:33, David Fetter wrote:
> >>>If this introduces new failure modes, please detail, and preferably
> >>>demonstrate, just what those new modes are.
> >>
> >>Hint bits, torn pages -> failed CRC. See earlier discussion:
> >>
> >>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg01975.php
> >
> >The patch requires that full page writes be on in order to obviate
> >this problem by never reading a torn page.
>
> Doesn't help. Hint bit updates are not WAL-logged.

What new failure modes are you envisioning for this case? Any way to
simulate them, even if it's by injecting faults into the source code?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-12-18 18:52:32 Re: Command Triggers
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-12-18 18:26:38 Re: JSON for PG 9.2