From: | Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel(at)mamane(dot)lu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: LibreOffice driver 1: Building libpq with Mozilla LDAP instead of OpenLDAP |
Date: | 2011-12-13 18:17:05 |
Message-ID: | 20111213181705.GB11517@capsaicin.mamane.lu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 12/13/2011 11:07 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On MacOS X and Microsoft Windows, the world is far more messy. There
>>> are several ways to install libpq (one-click installer, fink,
>>> MacPorts, ...), and each of these ways allows the user to select an
>>> install location (or a prefix thereof) freely.
>> This is less controversial.
> Yeah, I'm aware that sane handling of library dependencies is
> practically impossible under Windows, (...). I wasn't thinking
> about OSX though. (You're aware that Apple ships a perfectly fine
> libpq.so in Lion, no?)
No, I was not aware of that. Thank you for that information. Is it
installed by default?
Anyway, LibreOffice wishes to be compatible back to MacOS X 10.4
(probably to have some sort of MacOSX/PowerPC support), so that's not
yet useful to us, but it is good news! As I use PQconnectdbParams, I
also need version 9.0 or later (but I'd be willing to work around that
if it were useful).
--
Lionel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-12-13 18:28:49 | Re: Configuration include directory |
Previous Message | Yeb Havinga | 2011-12-13 18:13:03 | Re: patch for type privileges |