* Kevin Grittner (Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov) wrote:
> So the question is, would a
> patch which does the first two without the third be accepted by the
> community?
I'm about 99% sure the answer to that is 'yes'. Are you thinking of
having a background scheduler which handles the updating of
schedule-driven (instead of trigger-driven) MVs..? Not to try to
feature-creep this on you, but you might consider how a new backend
process which handles scheduled tasks could be generalized to go beyond
handling just MV updates.. :)
Thanks!
Stephen