| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
| Date: | 2011-11-03 15:05:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20111103150538.GA26104@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:04:19AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> So just to be clear there is and never has been a -1 value for xobject_id in the
> source table?
yes. min value of xobject_id is 1000, and we had trigger in place on the
table which logged all inserts/updates/deletes and the value -1 never
showed up (At least in the last couple of days, during which i was
making the copies).
> So a select count(*) from sssssss.xobjects where xobject_id = -1 on the source
> table yields 0?
yes, that's correct. both using index, and usingf seq scan.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tony Capobianco | 2011-11-03 15:16:42 | pg_dump schma while excluding specific table |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-11-03 15:04:19 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2011-11-03 15:21:37 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-11-03 15:04:19 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |