From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
Date: | 2011-11-03 15:01:30 |
Message-ID: | 20111103150130.GA17857@depesz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > index on xobject_id might be corrupted, but it doesn't explain that I
> > don't see duplicates with group_by/having query on xobjects, which uses
> > seqscan:
> I was just going to ask you to check that. Weird as can be.
> Does plain old "SELECT COUNT(*)" show a difference between the two
> tables?
yes. the xobjects table is written to quite a lot and turning it off is
not an option.
> Do you get similar misbehavior if you break the CREATE TABLE AS into a
> CREATE and an INSERT/SELECT? Also, please note the rowcount returned
> by INSERT/SELECT and see how it matches up with the tables afterwards.
>
> Does turning synchronize_seqscans off affect the behavior?
interesting. will test and let you know. the test will take couple of
hours, though.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mario Weilguni | 2011-11-03 15:02:07 | Re: Performance Problem with postgresql 9.03, 8GB RAM,Quadcore Processor Server--Need help!!!!!!! |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-03 14:55:20 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-11-03 15:04:19 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-03 14:55:20 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |