| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org |
| Subject: | Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| Date: | 2011-10-30 06:24:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20111030062409.GA22219@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
hi,
we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it
looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer
datetimes:
http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/
Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions built
with integer datetimes?
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sim Zacks | 2011-10-30 07:31:53 | Re: PostgreSQL Naming Rules - another question |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2011-10-29 17:05:59 | Re: From select to delete |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-10-30 09:53:57 | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| Previous Message | Stéphane A. Schildknecht | 2011-10-27 09:23:11 | pgfoundry is (almost) down |