Re: fstat vs. lseek

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fstat vs. lseek
Date: 2011-10-28 20:22:01
Message-ID: 201110282222.01614.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Friday, October 28, 2011 09:40:51 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > The lseek patches just got included in Linus tree.
>
> Excellent, thanks for the update!
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=ef3
> d0fd27e90f67e35da516dafc1482c82939a60
>
> So I guess this will be in Linux 3.2?
Unless they get reverted for some reason, yes.

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-28 20:28:08 Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-28 20:11:54 Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified