Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: fstat vs. lseek

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fstat vs. lseek
Date: 2011-10-28 20:22:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday, October 28, 2011 09:40:51 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > The lseek patches just got included in Linus tree.
> Excellent, thanks for the update!
> d0fd27e90f67e35da516dafc1482c82939a60
> So I guess this will be in Linux 3.2?
Unless they get reverted for some reason, yes.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-10-28 20:28:08
Subject: Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-10-28 20:11:54
Subject: Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group