Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
Date: 2011-10-28 02:36:01
Message-ID: 20111028023601.GE24234@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> So, it is going to be confusing to support both databases because there
> is the cleanup details I have to document if I use template1.

Presumably there's some other database in the system besides template1
if postgres doesn't exist.. Would it be possible to just make it
configurable? Then the user could pick a non-template database. Having
it fail if the option isn't used and the default postgres isn't there is
fine, imv.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-28 02:40:25 Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-28 02:31:43 Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped