| From: | Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
| Date: | 2011-10-19 07:37:32 |
| Message-ID: | 201110190738.p9J7csrv030953@ccmds32.silk.ntts.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> As I suggested in the reply to Simon, I think that the change of FPW
> should be WAL-logged separately from that of HS parameters. ISTM
> packing them in one WAL record makes XLogReportParameters()
> quite confusing. Thought?
I updated a patch for what you have suggested (that the change of FPW
should be WAL-logged separately from that of HS parameters).
I want to base on this patch if there are no other opinions.
Regards.
--------------------------------------------
Jun Ishizuka
NTT Software Corporation
TEL：045-317-7018
E-Mail: ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp
--------------------------------------------
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| standby_online_backup_09base-07fpw.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2011-10-19 08:21:54 | Re: Silent failure with invalid hba_file setting |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-10-19 06:31:10 | Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication |