From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Large C files |
Date: | 2011-10-17 06:00:19 |
Message-ID: | 20111017060019.GD15692@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:36:32PM +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> This evening, David Fetter described a problem to me that he was
> having building the Twitter FDW. It transpired that it was down to its
> dependence on an #include that was recently judged to be
> redundant.This seems like another reason to avoid using pgrminclude -
> even if we can be certain that the #includes are redundant within
> Postgres, we cannot be sure that they are redundant in third party
> code.
Perhaps something that tested some third-party code
automatically...say, doesn't the new buildfarm stuff allow running
some arbitrary code?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-10-17 07:16:05 | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-17 02:04:22 | Re: pg_comments (was: Allow \dd to show constraint comments) |