| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ron Adams <ron(at)constellationmedia(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE |
| Date: | 2011-10-11 14:44:34 |
| Message-ID: | 201110111444.p9BEiYL14010@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Ron Adams <ron(at)constellationmedia(dot)com> wrote:
> > The help for LOGIN/NOLOGIN at
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-createrole.html: "...NOLOGIN
> > is the default, except when CREATE ROLE is invoked through its alternative
> > spelling CREATE USER." The help for CREATE USER: "These clauses are an
> > obsolete, but still accepted, spelling of SUPERUSER and NOSUPERUSER. Note
> > that they are not equivalent to CREATEROLE as one might naively expect!" Eh?
>
> OK, brace yourself...
>
> You're mixing up the CREATEUSER option to the CREATE ROLE command with
> the completely separate command CREATE USER.
>
> See http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-createuser.html
>
> I wonder if we ought to consider removing CREATEUSER and NOCREATEUSER
> as synonyms for SUPERUSER and NOSUPERUSER. It looks like that change
> was made in 8.1, which is now EOL.
Agreed. They might still appear in dumps so maybe just remove
documentation about them.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-11 15:06:38 | Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-10-11 02:08:35 | Re: Change to documentation headers |