Re: memory-related bugs

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: memory-related bugs
Date: 2011-09-07 03:03:59
Message-ID: 20110907030358.GA16899@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:00:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:44:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I wonder whether we should instead fix this by copying the correct tuple
> >> length.
>
> > Seems like a step in the wrong direction. We only use typlen and typbyval
> > beyond the immediate context.
>
> Well, the whole point of exposing the pg_type tuple is to avoid making
> assumptions about what parts of it the type-specific analyze routine
> will wish to look at. If anything we ought to move in the direction of
> allowing the non-fixed fields to be accessible too. I didn't do that,
> since it would imply an ABI change (to add a HeapTuple field to
> VacAttrStats) and would therefore not be back-patchable. But I did
> change the code to use SearchSysCacheCopy, which fixes this bug and
> is readily extensible if we do decide to add such a field later.

That is a cleaner approach. Thanks.

--
Noah Misch http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2011-09-07 03:06:47 Re: cheaper snapshots redux
Previous Message Andy Colson 2011-09-07 02:58:48 REVIEW Single pass vacuum - take 2