From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion |
Date: | 2011-08-01 20:23:57 |
Message-ID: | 20110801202357.GC4014@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into
> >> > installer builds for Lion.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately the licence makes that a non-starter.
> >
> > What is it about a GPLed psql client that is a non-starter for the
> > installer? I'm not a fan of the GPL, but in this case, the
> > effects of linking it in are quite limited in scope, i.e. they
> > pertain to exactly one binary.
>
> The scope or number of files is irrelevant. Having just a single
> GPL'd file in those installers makes it impossible for ISVs to
> bundle them with their products, unless they open source them under
> a GPL compatible licence.
I know of no one, not even the wackiest AGPL loony-tune, who claims
that the GPL is infectious to the degree you're describing. Are you
*sure* the reason you state is the actual reason?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-08-01 20:27:51 | Re: [RFC] Common object property boards |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-01 20:12:56 | Re: [RFC] Common object property boards |