Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade
Date: 2011-07-20 19:29:07
Message-ID: 201107201929.p6KJT7c28336@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I am assuming that's a "yes" to both the directions: older -> newer , and
> >> newer -> older minor releases.
> >
> > Yes, I believe both directions would work unless we mentioned it the
> > release notes, in which cases it might not work, or might work older to
> > newer but newer to older.
>
> I don't see how this would get broken in a minor release. We'd have
> to change the WAL format or the tuple format, which is definitely not
> minor release material.

If there was a bug in the xlog stream content we might not be able to
fix it without breaking compatibility. Rare, but possible.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-07-20 20:02:56 Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade
Previous Message John R Pierce 2011-07-20 19:17:50 Re: announcements regarding tools

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-07-20 19:33:56 Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-20 19:23:07 Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123