Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432
Date: 2011-06-27 17:59:07
Message-ID: 201106271759.p5RHx7s03904@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?
>
> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.

This one which makes 50432 the default port.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/pg_upgrade text/x-diff 10.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-27 18:02:20 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the visibility map crash-safe.
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2011-06-27 17:56:37 Re: generate_series() Interpretation