| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432 |
| Date: | 2011-06-27 17:39:16 |
| Message-ID: | 201106271739.p5RHdGj23578@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 24 22:22:55 -0400 2011:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> >> > You want the environment variable support removed?
> >>
> >> I don't. ?It's production usefulness is questionable, but it's quite
> >> handy for testing IMO.
> >
> > If that's what you want, I think being able to read a file (whose
> > filename you pass with a switch to pg_upgrade) with a bunch of settings
> > is even more convenient. ?Heck, maybe it's more convenient for the user
> > too.
>
> If someone wants to do the work, I'm all in favor. But I don't feel
> that we should insist that Bruce do it.
Is there agreement to remove all pg_upgrade-specific environment
variables?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-27 17:44:34 | Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-27 17:28:30 | Re: [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.0 - 'missing_ok' support of get_object_address |