Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes
Date: 2011-06-23 12:50:43
Message-ID: 201106231250.p5NCohc18011@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > (If assigning blame and being point of contact is really the truth, why
> > > is there no email address?)
> >
> > I already had everyone's email address and it was inefficient to type it
> > on every item. I could easily look up their email addresses in my mail
> > program.
>
> If you want proof, we only started using full names, e.g. not "(Tom)",
> in 9.0. It didn't matter if users knew who Tom was --- we did. Look at
> the 6.1 release notes --- they are mostly only first names.
>
> Second, if you want to get rid of the names, we can still place them in
> SGML comments so developers can see who did a feature.

FYI, the general logic was that I used first and last names only if two
people had the same first name.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-06-23 13:48:33 Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-23 12:22:26 Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes