From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes |
Date: | 2011-06-23 12:50:43 |
Message-ID: | 201106231250.p5NCohc18011@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > (If assigning blame and being point of contact is really the truth, why
> > > is there no email address?)
> >
> > I already had everyone's email address and it was inefficient to type it
> > on every item. I could easily look up their email addresses in my mail
> > program.
>
> If you want proof, we only started using full names, e.g. not "(Tom)",
> in 9.0. It didn't matter if users knew who Tom was --- we did. Look at
> the 6.1 release notes --- they are mostly only first names.
>
> Second, if you want to get rid of the names, we can still place them in
> SGML comments so developers can see who did a feature.
FYI, the general logic was that I used first and last names only if two
people had the same first name.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-23 13:48:33 | Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-23 12:22:26 | Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes |