Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-06-03 20:35:14
Message-ID: 201106032035.p53KZEs20285@momjian.us (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > ?The number of people reading and replying to
> > emails on pgsql-bugs is already insufficient, perhaps because of the
> > (incorrect) perception that Tom does or will fix everything and no one
> > else needs to care. ?So anything that makes it harder for people to
> > follow along and participate is a non-starter IMV.
> 
> Actually I think most of our bugs don't come in from pgsql-bugs. I
> think we want to add other bugs that come up from discussions on
> -hackers or -general which for whatever reason don't get immediately
> fixed.

Agreed.  At that point the TODO list is no longer needed, perhaps.  It
would be nice to have a system where we could categorize items, and add
"features" as well because the bug/feature distinction is often very
hard to make.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-06-03 20:36:30
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-06-03 20:31:49
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group