Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Date: 2011-06-03 18:10:03
Message-ID: 20110603181003.GA1222@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:17:08AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> As you can see, this works out to a bit more than a 4% improvement on
> this two-core box. I also got access (thanks to Nate Boley) to a
> 24-core box and ran the same test with scale factor 100 and
> shared_buffers=8GB. Here are the results of alternating runs without
> and with the patch on that machine:
>
> tps = 36291.996228 (including connections establishing)
> tps = 129242.054578 (including connections establishing)
> tps = 36704.393055 (including connections establishing)
> tps = 128998.648106 (including connections establishing)
> tps = 36531.208898 (including connections establishing)
> tps = 131341.367344 (including connections establishing)

Nice!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-06-03 18:19:04 Re: Streaming solution and v3.1 protocol
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-03 18:07:44 Re: Domains versus polymorphic functions, redux