| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Inspecting a DB - psql or system tables ? | 
| Date: | 2011-05-27 18:31:43 | 
| Message-ID: | 20110527183143.GB17056@shinkuro.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:26:33PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > While parsing the output of psql is cumbersome, accessing the
> > system tables seems more likely to break whenever a new version
> > of PostgreSQL comes out.
> 
> Really? Those catalogs are pretty stable, and when changed they're
> usually extended (new columns are added). So well written queries won't
> break very often. Actually I'd expect the psql output to change much
> more often.
The whole point of the information_schema is that it's well-defined by
the standard.  The system tables themselves do sometimes change
between versions -- that's why you get warnings from psql when you
start up a client with a different major version number than the
server.  (If you want to see this in action, try using a 7.4-era
client with 9.0, and do some tab completion or something like that.)
A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz | 2011-05-27 19:01:35 | Re: trigger - dynamic WHERE clause | 
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-05-27 18:26:33 | Re: Inspecting a DB - psql or system tables ? |