Re: Pre-alloc ListCell's optimization

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pre-alloc ListCell's optimization
Date: 2011-05-25 03:03:05
Message-ID: 20110525030305.GI4548@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> Finally, sorry it's kind of a fugly patch, it's just a proof of
> concept and I'd be happy to clean it up if others feel it's worthwhile
> and a reasonable approach, but I really need to get it out there and
> take a break from it (I've been a bit obsessive-compulsive about it
> since PGCon.. :D).

Erm, sorry, just to clarify, while it's a P-O-C patch, it does compile
cleanly and passes all the regression tests, so it's something that one
can play with at least. Not sure if it'd be worth benchmarking it until
we feel comfortable that this is a decent approach, but I wouldn't
complain if someone decided to...

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-05-25 03:26:55 Re: Should partial dumps include extensions?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2011-05-25 02:56:21 Pre-alloc ListCell's optimization