Re: undead index

From: Jens Wilke <jens(dot)wilke(at)affinitas(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: undead index
Date: 2011-05-06 15:01:05
Message-ID: 201105061701.06448.jens.wilke@affinitas.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday 04 May 2011 17:32:50 Tom Lane wrote:

> Hmm, is this an autogenerated index?

I don't think so.
And to confirm, that i really deleted the new cluster between the pg_upgrade
run and the dump|restore i did it again and was able to revive this index
again:

foo=# \d+ foo.bar_idx
Index "foo.bar_idx"
Column | Type | Definition | Storage | Description
----------+-----------------------+------------+----------+-------------
ulq_guid | character varying(24) | ulq_guid | extended |
btree, for table "foo.foo"

But it's again not in the pg_dumpall output, using the same binary like for
the dump|restore.

Regards, Jens

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Iain Barnett 2011-05-06 15:11:52 Locale and UTF8 for template1 in 8.4.4
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2011-05-06 14:52:53 Re: Bidirectional replication