Re: Improving the memory allocator

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving the memory allocator
Date: 2011-04-26 12:25:10
Message-ID: 201104261425.10695.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:59:45 PM Radosław Smogura wrote:
> I didn't followed this topic carefully, so sorry If I wrote something
> that was written, but I thought about following approach at least for
> message sending, etc.:
>
> 1. When initializing MemoryContext (pool) give one parameter that will
> be stack size. Stack is addition to normal operations.
You can't allocate memory on the stack and return that.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-04-26 12:25:59 Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-04-26 12:22:43 Re: Possible deadlock issue when one transaction waiting on other and vice versa? Should, ideally, postgres recognize blocking situation?