On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:54:31AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Even though this didn't show any difference in Dan's performance
> tests, it seems like reasonable insurance against creating a new
> bottleneck in very high concurrency situations.
> Dan, do you have a patch for this, or should I create one?
Sure, patch is attached.
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-04-25 07:14:16|
|Subject: Re: Unlogged tables, persistent kind|
|Previous:||From: Daniel Farina||Date: 2011-04-25 02:06:06|
|Subject: Re: fsync reliability|