Re: pg_upgrade bug found!

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade bug found!
Date: 2011-04-09 03:01:48
Message-ID: 20110409030148.GK4548@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

bricklen,

* bricklen (bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Now, is this safe to run against my production database?

Yes, with a few caveats. One recommendation is to also increase
autovacuum_freeze_max_age to 500000000 (500m), which will hopefully
prevent autovacuum from 'butting in' and causing issues during the
process. Also, a database-wide 'VACUUM FREEZE;' should be lower-risk,
if you can afford it (it will cause a lot of i/o on the system). The
per-table 'VACUUM FREEZE <table>;' that the script does can end up
removing clog files prematurely.

> Anyone have any suggestions or changes before I commit myself to this
> course of action?

If you run into problems, and perhaps even before starting, you may want
to pop in to #postgresql on irc.freenode.net, there are people there who
can help you with this process who are very familiar with PG.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-04-09 03:07:51 Re: pg_upgrade bug found!
Previous Message bricklen 2011-04-09 02:53:05 Re: pg_upgrade bug found!